Mobile Sellular

Using this smart phone I completely changed my outlook on design, ergonomics, quality of materials and the materials themselves. During the presentation, I was slightly bewildered why the plastic again, and even glossy? In fact, taking the first smartphone in hand, you know - everything is as it should be. Why housing collapsible? Its simple - it must be so, if you can make a smart strong and durable. Samsung Galaxy S 3 is such that I could not get at least some rustling, doing even greater efforts. Even in HTC One X was a small stroke on the back, if you click on it, everything is gorgeous. I have a collapsible design a number of advantages, for example, you can always put a larger capacity battery or buy a spare if go camping, as well, if the cap is scratched - it can always be replaced. The situation is even better than a year ago in the Galaxy S 2, there is no cap covered the entire rear portion, which means that if a smartphone plyuhnetsya back on the asphalt, scratched and non-replaceable part. Of course, a year ago I called this design improvement, as in the original Galaxy S cover covered all the back and was in the habit of creaking. But in the "top three" were able to make reliable attachment, I can not imagine how anything could squeak in a year.
Why plastic? Again, I quickly found a reasonable explanation. If the body was made of aluminum - would likely have been molded, moreover, for the hard fall on the asphalt, metal deteriorates heavily, and then traces not grind themselves. If the building was a glass - and even do not want to represent what would have been, drop smartphone even rovnenko tile.
Why glossy plastic? Again, I quickly ... But no, it still remains a question. Feeling no sleaze, contrary to expectations, it looks pretty nice, but the material, as in the Nokia 808 PureView would be more practical, I think. There, too, and plastic collapsible design looks better.